OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

cti-stix message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: Re: [cti-stix] [+1]'s

For the +1, I believe it is a "Sighting".  For the other, I am not sure what it is.  You are making an Assertion about someone else's Assertion.  

Yes, lets rename "incident" to "investigation" and have some sort of current status field. 



Bret Jordan CISSP
Director of Security Architecture and Standards | Office of the CTO
Blue Coat Systems
PGP Fingerprint: 63B4 FC53 680A 6B7D 1447  F2C0 74F8 ACAE 7415 0050
"Without cryptography vihv vivc ce xhrnrw, however, the only thing that can not be unscrambled is an egg." 

On Nov 10, 2015, at 06:24, Wunder, John A. <jwunder@mitre.org> wrote:

I like “sighting” and “confirmation”.

While we’re naming things, I’ll also suggest renaming “Incident” to “Investigation” and having some sort of field (status?) to denote whether it’s a true “incident” (per the definition of whoever is creating the construct, I guess)

On Nov 10, 2015, at 6:32 AM, Jason Keirstead <Jason.Keirstead@CA.IBM.COM> wrote:

If we do create two constructs, I would humbly suggest that we try to come up with a more distinct term for this, otherwise discussing "sighting" and "citation" in conversation will result in endless confusion.

Its already had enough for me to communicate the difference between an indicator and an observable to people :)

Jason Keirstead
Product Architect, Security Intelligence, IBM Security Systems
www.ibm.com/security | www.securityintelligence.com

Without data, all you are is just another person with an opinion - Unknown

<graycol.gif>Trey Darley ---11/10/2015 10:18:30 AM---On 06.11.2015 22:58:44, Terry MacDonald wrote: >

From: Trey Darley <trey@soltra.com>
To: Terry MacDonald <terry@soltra.com>
Cc: Jason Keirstead/CanEast/IBM@IBMCA, "Barnum, Sean D." <sbarnum@mitre.org>, "cti-stix@lists.oasis-open.org" <cti-stix@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date: 11/10/2015 10:18 AM
Subject: Re: [cti-stix] [+1]'s
Sent by: <cti-stix@lists.oasis-open.org>

On 06.11.2015 22:58:44, Terry MacDonald wrote:
> 1. +1 = “I have seen this too” (A sighting)

I would call this a *sighting*.

> 2. +1 = “I agree with your assertion” (Agreement with an assertion
> made)

I would call this a *citing*. (Perhaps "citation" to minimize

Trey Darley
Senior Security Engineer
4DAA 0A88 34BC 27C9 FD2B  A97E D3C6 5C74 0FB7 E430
Soltra | An FS-ISAC & DTCC Company
"In protocol design, perfection has been reached not when there is
nothing left to add, but when there is nothing left to take away."
--RFC 1925
[attachment "signature.asc" deleted by Jason Keirstead/CanEast/IBM]

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]