OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

cti-stix message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [cti-stix] Re: [cti-cybox] [cti-stix] Re: [cti-cybox] Revoke Cybox Observable


Something I am not understanding from this trail. This problem all originates from this process:


Why can one not simply edit the original observable, preserving links, and not orphaning anything?

If we can't update/edit/append/delete an observable and have that cascade to all linked indicators ... then there is little point to having this linkage vs simply embedding signatures directly in the indicator.

Is the reason you can't do this a problem in STIX/Cybox? Or is this a tool issue (does Edge not let you edit an observable? I am not sure, have never tried)

-
Jason Keirstead
Product Architect, Security Intelligence, IBM Security Systems
www.ibm.com/security | www.securityintelligence.com

Without data, all you are is just another person with an opinion - Unknown


Inactive hide details for Aharon Chernin ---11/10/2015 07:35:51 PM---Sarah, We are throwing around a number of ideas of regardiAharon Chernin ---11/10/2015 07:35:51 PM---Sarah, We are throwing around a number of ideas of regarding cleaning up orphaned observables. Our n

From: Aharon Chernin <achernin@soltra.com>
To: Sarah Kelley <Sarah.Kelley@cisecurity.org>, "Jordan, Bret" <bret.jordan@bluecoat.com>, Ivan Kirillov <ikirillov@mitre.org>
Cc: Unknown Unknown <athiasjerome@gmail.com>, Ali Khan <akhan@soltra.com>, "cti-stix@lists.oasis-open.org" <cti-stix@lists.oasis-open.org>, "cti-cybox@lists.oasis-open.org" <cti-cybox@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date: 11/10/2015 07:35 PM
Subject: Re: [cti-stix] Re: [cti-cybox] [cti-stix] Re: [cti-cybox] Revoke Cybox Observable
Sent by: <cti-stix@lists.oasis-open.org>




Sarah,

We are throwing around a number of ideas of regarding cleaning up orphaned observables. Our next major release should include a STIX compliant solution.


Aharon


--
Aharon Chernin
CTO

SOLTRA | An FS-ISAC & DTCC Company
18301 Bermuda green Dr
Tampa, fl 33647
813.470.2173 | achernin@soltra.com
www.soltra.com


From: <cti-stix@lists.oasis-open.org> on behalf of Sarah Kelley <Sarah.Kelley@cisecurity.org>
Date:
Tuesday, November 10, 2015 at 1:21 PM
To:
"Jordan, Bret" <bret.jordan@bluecoat.com>, Ivan Kirillov <ikirillov@mitre.org>
Cc:
Unknown Unknown <athiasjerome@gmail.com>, Ali Khan <akhan@soltra.com>, "cti-stix@lists.oasis-open.org" <cti-stix@lists.oasis-open.org>, "cti-cybox@lists.oasis-open.org" <cti-cybox@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject:
[cti-stix] Re: [cti-cybox] [cti-stix] Re: [cti-cybox] Revoke Cybox Observable

At this point, we’re currently just trying to clean up our own database. I’m sure there is a much wider issue involved, but our current context is that we have the same observable in our system five different times (which is obviously unnecessary). The only things that changed were things like TLP, or “Hey, I fat-fingered something!” I understand the concern about "what does it mean to revoke a fact", but what if it’s just wrong? You type 1.1.1.1, and you really meant 2.2.2.2? The first is not correct, but currently is lingering in the system, even after unlinking it from the indicator.

Sarah Kelley
Senior CERT Analyst
Center for Internet Security (CIS)
Integrated Intelligence Center (IIC)
Multi-State Information Sharing and Analysis Center (MS-ISAC)
1-866-787-4722 (7×24 SOC)
Email: cert@cisecurity.org
www.cisecurity.org
Follow us @CISecurity


From: "Jordan, Bret" <bret.jordan@bluecoat.com>
Date:
Tuesday, November 10, 2015 at 1:16 PM
To:
Ivan Kirillov <ikirillov@mitre.org>
Cc:
Sarah Kelley <sarah.kelley@cisecurity.org>, Unknown Unknown <athiasjerome@gmail.com>, Ali Khan <akhan@soltra.com>, "cti-stix@lists.oasis-open.org" <cti-stix@lists.oasis-open.org>, "cti-cybox@lists.oasis-open.org" <cti-cybox@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject:
Re: [cti-cybox] [cti-stix] Re: [cti-cybox] Revoke Cybox Observable

We have talked about this a lot in the past, in regards to STIX, and I now view this as an implementation or process related issue. The reason for that is you can not guarantee that the other end of the link will honor your request. Maybe in "like" systems, meaning all systems built by EclecticIQ or Soltra, you would have some level of success.

But when you span across products there is no guarantee that they have implemented it in their code, nor that the administrator will allow it. Requests like that may go in to a bucket for human review.


Thanks,

Bret



Bret Jordan CISSP
Director of Security Architecture and Standards | Office of the CTO
Blue Coat Systems
PGP Fingerprint: 63B4 FC53 680A 6B7D 1447 F2C0 74F8 ACAE 7415 0050
"Without cryptography vihv vivc ce xhrnrw, however, the only thing that can not be unscrambled is an egg."

This message and attachments may contain confidential information. If it appears that this message was sent to you by mistake, any retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message and attachments is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the message and any attachments.
. . .




[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]