Re: [cti-stix] Things that are difficult in STIX

[John Anderson <janderson@soltra.com>]

I can't vote officially anyway, but I'd vote for human-friendly (aka readable). I mean, there's no time like the  1447963043!

JSA

________________________________________
From: Trey Darley
Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2015 2:44 PM
To: Jordan, Bret
Cc: Jason Keirstead; Terry MacDonald; John Anderson; cti-stix@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [cti-stix] Things that are difficult in STIX

On 19.11.2015 19:04:45, Jordan, Bret wrote:
>
> I am not against UNIX EPOC if the majority of people want to go that
> way. But I see it as either ISO8601 with the format I have shown
> above or UNIX EPOC with some sort of time zone element. The nice
> thing about the format above is it includes the timezone offset.
>

One inherent disadvantage of epoch time is the built-in expiration
date. My vote's for ISO8601.

>
> source: https://xkcd.com/1179/ <https://xkcd.com/1179/>
>

Very nice! ^_^

--
Cheers,
Trey
--
Trey Darley
Senior Security Engineer
4DAA 0A88 34BC 27C9 FD2B  A97E D3C6 5C74 0FB7 E430
Soltra | An FS-ISAC & DTCC Company
www.soltra.com
--
"Every old idea will be proposed again with a different name and a
different presentation, regardless of whether it works." --RFC 1925