[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [cti-stix] STIX timestamps and ISO 8601:2000
On 23.11.2015 17:22:16, Trey Darley wrote: > > I don't insist on nanoseconds. I thought there was demand and since > the bits are cheap, why not futureproof? Since it seems I misread the > general consensus, let's standardize on nanoseconds and be done with > it. The point is a) let's have one clear way to do it and b) let's > take a decision so we can move on to other topics. > Sorry, fumblefingers, s/standardize on nanoseconds/standardize on milliseconds/g -- Cheers, Trey -- Trey Darley Senior Security Engineer 4DAA 0A88 34BC 27C9 FD2B A97E D3C6 5C74 0FB7 E430 Soltra | An FS-ISAC & DTCC Company www.soltra.com -- "There's never enough time. Thank you for yours." --Dan Geer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]