cti-stix message

Subject: Re: [cti-stix] STIX timestamps and ISO 8601:2000

From: Trey Darley <trey@soltra.com>
To: "Struse, Richard" <Richard.Struse@HQ.DHS.GOV>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 05:22:37 +0000

On 25.11.2015 01:40:49, Struse, Richard wrote:
> 
> So, since there appears to be robust library support for
> manipulating ISO8601-formatted date/time values and since it allows
> the representation of reduced-precision values (such as a date +
> hour or date + hour + minute), is there any reason why we can’t
> agree on this and move on?
> 

+1

-- 
Cheers,
Trey
--
Trey Darley
Senior Security Engineer
4DAA 0A88 34BC 27C9 FD2B  A97E D3C6 5C74 0FB7 E430
Soltra | An FS-ISAC & DTCC Company
www.soltra.com
--
"It is more complicated than you think." --RFC 1925

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

References:
- Fwd: STIX timestamps and ISO 8601:2000
  - From: Jerome Athias <athiasjerome@gmail.com>
- Re: [cti-stix] Fwd: STIX timestamps and ISO 8601:2000
  - From: "Jason Keirstead" <Jason.Keirstead@ca.ibm.com>
- Re: [cti-stix] STIX timestamps and ISO 8601:2000
  - From: "Wunder, John A." <jwunder@mitre.org>
- RE: [cti-stix] STIX timestamps and ISO 8601:2000
  - From: Terry MacDonald <terry@soltra.com>
- Re: [cti-stix] STIX timestamps and ISO 8601:2000
  - From: "Wunder, John A." <jwunder@mitre.org>
- Re: [cti-stix] STIX timestamps and ISO 8601:2000
  - From: "Jordan, Bret" <bret.jordan@bluecoat.com>
- RE: [cti-stix] STIX timestamps and ISO 8601:2000
  - From: "Foley, Alexander - GIS" <alexander.foley@bankofamerica.com>
- Re: [cti-stix] STIX timestamps and ISO 8601:2000
  - From: "Wunder, John A." <jwunder@mitre.org>
- RE: [cti-stix] STIX timestamps and ISO 8601:2000
  - From: "Struse, Richard" <Richard.Struse@HQ.DHS.GOV>