[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [cti-stix] Timestamps - Proposal
I support this list 100% too. Terry MacDonald Senior STIX Subject Matter Expert SOLTRA | An FS-ISAC and DTCC Company +61 (407) 203 206 |
terry@soltra.com From: cti-stix@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:cti-stix@lists.oasis-open.org]
On Behalf Of Barnum, Sean D. I support this list 100%. sean From:
"cti-stix@lists.oasis-open.org" <cti-stix@lists.oasis-open.org> on behalf of "Jordan,
Bret" <bret.jordan@bluecoat.com> All,
In an effort to resolve the endless timestamp debate and come to consensus, Mark, John Wunder, Jason, and I had a lively chat on Slack and have all agreed to give
and take to come to middle ground on the following. We would therefor like to propose the following as an official proposal for timestamps in STIX 2.0. Is everyone okay with this? 1) Timestamps MUST follow RFC 3339 with the following extra requirements Thanks, Bret Bret Jordan CISSP
Director of Security Architecture and Standards | Office of the CTO Blue Coat Systems PGP Fingerprint: 63B4 FC53 680A 6B7D 1447 F2C0 74F8 ACAE 7415 0050 "Without cryptography vihv vivc ce xhrnrw, however, the only thing that can not be unscrambled is an egg." |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]