cti-stix message

Subject: Re: [cti-stix] Object ID format

From: Paul Patrick <ppatrick@isightpartners.com>
To: "Barnum, Sean D." <sbarnum@mitre.org>, "Jordan, Bret" <bret.jordan@bluecoat.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 18:47:29 +0000

+1 with Sean’s comment that we should strongly resist tying this to TAXII. A number of communities of trust that I work with have adopted STIX but not TAXII at this point, so while I’m very bullish on TAXII we still need to be able to leverage STIX with other exchange approaches.

Paul Patrick

iSIGHT Partners

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [cti-stix] Object ID format
  - From: Patrick Maroney <Pmaroney@Specere.org>
- Re: [cti-stix] Object ID format
  - From: "Jordan, Bret" <bret.jordan@bluecoat.com>

References:
- Re: [cti-stix] Object ID format
  - From: "Barnum, Sean D." <sbarnum@mitre.org>
- Re: [cti-stix] Object ID format
  - From: "Wunder, John A." <jwunder@mitre.org>
- Re: [cti-stix] Object ID format
  - From: "Barnum, Sean D." <sbarnum@mitre.org>
- Re: [cti-stix] Object ID format
  - From: Paul Patrick <ppatrick@isightpartners.com>
- Re: [cti-stix] Object ID format
  - From: "Jordan, Bret" <bret.jordan@bluecoat.com>
- Re: [cti-stix] Object ID format
  - From: "Barnum, Sean D." <sbarnum@mitre.org>