[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: indicator type
I would like to propose that we rename this field, from Indicator_Type to something that indicates that it is a "label" or a "tag". This can still be bound to a controlled vocabulary. But not calling it a TYPE is a good thing, IMHO. And I believe the world has gravitated to this idea that content can have labels or tags. It also makes more sense to have a series of "labels" or a series of "tags" versus having a series of "types". Thanks, Bret Bret Jordan CISSP Director of Security Architecture and Standards | Office of the CTO Blue Coat Systems PGP Fingerprint: 63B4 FC53 680A 6B7D 1447 F2C0 74F8 ACAE 7415 0050 "Without cryptography vihv vivc ce xhrnrw, however, the only thing that can not be unscrambled is an egg." |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]