[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: Results of the Campaign Mini-Group
The Campaign mini-group also discussed two additional TLOs that the STIX SC might consider. 1) Threat Group My question is, is this really a different TLO, or should we make a property on the Threat Actor TLO that has a Group_Name property. We could then allow Threat Actor TLOs to be related to other Threat Actor TLOs. So Threat_Actor (A) could be a GROUP and Threat_Actor (B) and Threat_Actor (C) could be individuals that are related to the Group (Threat_Actor (A)). 2) Intrusion_Set The idea behind this TLO is that it is nearly identical to the Campaign TLO but is used for relating a collection of Campaigns. Thanks, Bret Bret Jordan CISSP Director of Security Architecture and Standards | Office of the CTO Blue Coat Systems PGP Fingerprint: 63B4 FC53 680A 6B7D 1447 F2C0 74F8 ACAE 7415 0050 "Without cryptography vihv vivc ce xhrnrw, however, the only thing that can not be unscrambled is an egg."
|
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]