cti-stix message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [cti-stix] Unicode, strings, and STIX
- From: John-Mark Gurney <jmg@newcontext.com>
- To: "Wunder, John A." <jwunder@mitre.org>
- Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2016 11:54:30 -0700
Wunder, John A. wrote this message on Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 14:17 +0000:
> - HL7: specify a minimum length that specifications have to be able to handle, but no maximum length (could not find actual language here due to specs not being free, I asked a colleague,)
Just a IMO, if you specify a minimum length that has to be handled,
you have also just specified the maximum length, as an implementation
that wants to work now knows that anything longer may not be handled
by all other implementations, so a mandatory minimum is really just
another name for maximum...
--
John-Mark
- References:
- RE: [cti-stix] Unicode, strings, and STIX
- From: "Piazza, Rich" <rpiazza@mitre.org>
- RE: [cti-stix] Unicode, strings, and STIX
- From: "Jason Keirstead" <Jason.Keirstead@ca.ibm.com>
- RE: [cti-stix] Unicode, strings, and STIX
- From: "Piazza, Rich" <rpiazza@mitre.org>
- Re: [cti-stix] Unicode, strings, and STIX
- From: "Jordan, Bret" <bret.jordan@bluecoat.com>
- RE: [cti-stix] Unicode, strings, and STIX
- From: "Piazza, Rich" <rpiazza@mitre.org>
- Re: [cti-stix] Unicode, strings, and STIX
- From: Mark Davidson <mdavidson@soltra.com>
- Re: [cti-stix] Unicode, strings, and STIX
- From: Mark Davidson <mdavidson@soltra.com>
- RE: [cti-stix] Unicode, strings, and STIX
- From: "Piazza, Rich" <rpiazza@mitre.org>
- RE: [cti-stix] Unicode, strings, and STIX
- From: "Jason Keirstead" <Jason.Keirstead@ca.ibm.com>
- Re: [cti-stix] Unicode, strings, and STIX
- From: "Wunder, John A." <jwunder@mitre.org>
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]