Re: [cti-stix] relationships

[Trey Darley <trey@kingfisherops.com>]

On 27.06.2016 08:10:59, Terry MacDonald wrote:
> 
> I can see this makes it harder when generating the objects, but in
> my opinion we should do whatever is the easiest for the reader, as
> this week be read way more times than it will be written...
> 
> Can we change it so that there is a level 1 relationship section
> showing all the relationships, but with no real details. Then we
> have the relationship details with each objects details. In that way
> of someone wants an overview is in one place, and if they are
> implementing an object then the required relationships detail is
> right there in that section - making it easier to use.
> 

While this approach inevitably imposes additional work on the editors,
I think that the benefit to implementors more that justifies the
additional work.

I would suggest that for the initial Summer release we baseline on a
relationship appendix and divvy out the per-object explication for the
Winter release.

-- 
Cheers,
Trey
++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++
Kingfisher Operations, sprl
gpg fingerprint: 85F3 5F54 4A2A B4CD 33C4  5B9B B30D DD6E 62C8 6C1D
++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++
--
"It is always possible to aglutenate multiple separate problems into a
single complex interdependent solution. In most cases this is a bad
idea." --RFC 1925

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature