Re: [cti-stix] relationships

I am glad to know you all find them useful where they are. I will try and do some tweaking to the formatting to make them easier to understand. Changes forth coming.

Thanks,

Bret

Bret Jordan CISSP

Director of Security Architecture and Standards | Office of the CTO

Blue Coat Systems

PGP Fingerprint: 63B4 FC53 680A 6B7D 1447 F2C0 74F8 ACAE 7415 0050

"Without cryptography vihv vivc ce xhrnrw, however, the only thing that can not be unscrambled is an egg."

On Jun 27, 2016, at 15:54, Trey Darley <trey@kingfisherops.com> wrote:

On 27.06.2016 08:10:59, Terry MacDonald wrote:

I can see this makes it harder when generating the objects, but in
my opinion we should do whatever is the easiest for the reader, as
this week be read way more times than it will be written...

Can we change it so that there is a level 1 relationship section
showing all the relationships, but with no real details. Then we
have the relationship details with each objects details. In that way
of someone wants an overview is in one place, and if they are
implementing an object then the required relationships detail is
right there in that section - making it easier to use.

While this approach inevitably imposes additional work on the editors,
I think that the benefit to implementors more that justifies the
additional work.

I would suggest that for the initial Summer release we baseline on a
relationship appendix and divvy out the per-object explication for the
Winter release.

--
Cheers,
Trey
++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++
Kingfisher Operations, sprl
gpg fingerprint: 85F3 5F54 4A2A B4CD 33C4 5B9B B30D DD6E 62C8 6C1D
++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++
--
"It is always possible to aglutenate multiple separate problems into a
single complex interdependent solution. In most cases this is a bad
idea." --RFC 1925

cti-stix message