Object Summary

["Jordan, Bret" <bret.jordan@bluecoat.com>]

To help our discussion in the morning... Here are all of the current objects and their fields... Required fields are marked with a red R.  Some interesting points that are visible because of the diagram:

1) Every object that has a name field has it as required, except for Indicator.  So only 1 object has name as optional.  So should we make it required or remove it or just leave it as is?

2) Every object that has a suggested open-vocab has the labels field as required

3) Most objects have very few required fields.... I feel like the ones we understand really well, tend to have a lot of required fields.

4) There is a lot of boiler plate for each object (Common Properties) 13 fields.  

5) We have a couple of objects that are really just a stub 

 

Thanks,

Bret

Bret Jordan CISSP

Director of Security Architecture and Standards | Office of the CTO

Blue Coat Systems

PGP Fingerprint: 63B4 FC53 680A 6B7D 1447  F2C0 74F8 ACAE 7415 0050

"Without cryptography vihv vivc ce xhrnrw, however, the only thing that can not be unscrambled is an egg." 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail