Re: [cti-stix] STIX 2.1 discussion

["Jordan, Bret" <bret.jordan@bluecoat.com>]

Confidence does not really make sense before we have digital signatures, neither does the opinion object..  Without digital signatures first, there is no "real" confidence or opinion as everything could be faked.  

Thanks,

Bret

Bret Jordan CISSP

Director of Security Architecture and Standards | Office of the CTO

Blue Coat Systems

PGP Fingerprint: 63B4 FC53 680A 6B7D 1447  F2C0 74F8 ACAE 7415 0050

"Without cryptography vihv vivc ce xhrnrw, however, the only thing that can not be unscrambled is an egg." 

On Aug 22, 2016, at 01:34, Trey Darley <trey@kingfisherops.com> wrote:

On 20.08.2016 08:22:15, Terry MacDonald wrote:

My wish list for 2.1:

+1 for Terry's list of STIX 2.1/2.2 priorities

--
Cheers,
Trey
++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++
Kingfisher Operations, sprl
gpg fingerprint: 85F3 5F54 4A2A B4CD 33C4  5B9B B30D DD6E 62C8 6C1D
++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++
--
"All systems, regardless of composition, do one of three things: blow
up, oscillate, or stay about the same." --anonymous

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail