Re: [cti-stix] Typo in range of integers

[Trey Darley <trey@kingfisherops.com>]

On 09.06.2017 12:57:52, Wunder, John A. wrote:
> I think it may be the result of a misunderstanding, it came as a
> result of this comment from the TAB:
> https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/TAB-1501. If you look at the
> JSON spec it calls out that range as the set that allows you to
> precisely represent the integer, but I think when we got that
> comment we didn't explicitly make that decision…we just saw that
> comment with the value, saw it in the JSON spec, and copied it in.
> 
> IMO we could just change that to be 63 and it would be fine, unless
> people feel like it’s important to constrain the range further to
> avoid being able to represent imprecise integers.
> 

JMG, thanks for catching this!

I agree with John that we should go ahead and fix the typo before we
open the CS ballot.

-- 
Cheers,
Trey
++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++
Kingfisher Operations, sprl
gpg fingerprint: 85F3 5F54 4A2A B4CD 33C4  5B9B B30D DD6E 62C8 6C1D
++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++
--
"No one can terrorize a whole nation, unless we are all his
accomplices." --Edward R. Murrow

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature