[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [cti-stix] GeoJSON
On 28.06.2017 12:20:09, Struse, Richard J. wrote: > To clarify, I think what would be deferred to a later date is > re-evaluating whether or not GeoJSON support belongs in STIX at all. > As written it sounded as if that was a foregone conclusion that was > simply pushed to a later release. I don’t believe that to be the > case. > Thanks for the clarification, Richard. It was not my intent to suggest that GeoJSON would *definitely* be added in a future release. Poor phraseology on my part, apologies for the confusion. -- Cheers, Trey ++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++ Director of Standards Development, New Context gpg fingerprint: 3918 9D7E 50F5 088F 823F 018A 831A 270A 6C4F C338 ++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++ -- "It Has To Work." --RFC 1925
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]