Re: [cti-stix] Re: [EXT] [cti-stix] Location, latitude/longitude, and precision

[Trey Darley <trey@newcontext.com>]

On 19.07.2017 12:47:55, Struse, Richard J. wrote:
> I’ve come to believe that precision should be optional. The purist
> in me wants the text to say that if precision is omitted, the
> precision of the lat/long is unspecified. But I’m willing to live
> with text that says if precision is unspecified, it defaults to 10km
> as John-Mark originally proposed.
> 

Thanks, Rich.

I think this is the correct approach.

-- 
Cheers,
Trey
++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++
Director of Standards Development, New Context
gpg fingerprint: 3918 9D7E 50F5 088F 823F  018A 831A 270A 6C4F C338
++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++
--
"No matter how hard you try, you can't make a baby in much less than 9
months. Trying to speed this up *might* make it slower, but it won't
make it happen any quicker." --RFC 1925

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature