Re: [cti-stix] Re: [EXT] [cti-stix] Location, latitude/longitude, and precision

["Struse, Richard J." <rjs@mitre.org>]

Your opinion is noted. What do others on the list think?

On 7/19/17, 9:59 AM, "Bret Jordan" <Bret_Jordan@symantec.com> wrote:

    I disagree
    Bret 
    
    
    Sent from my iPhone
    
    > On Jul 19, 2017, at 3:39 PM, Trey Darley <trey@newcontext.com> wrote:
    > 
    >> On 19.07.2017 12:47:55, Struse, Richard J. wrote:
    >> I’ve come to believe that precision should be optional. The purist
    >> in me wants the text to say that if precision is omitted, the
    >> precision of the lat/long is unspecified. But I’m willing to live
    >> with text that says if precision is unspecified, it defaults to 10km
    >> as John-Mark originally proposed.
    >> 
    > 
    > Thanks, Rich.
    > 
    > I think this is the correct approach.
    > 
    > -- 
    > Cheers,
    > Trey
    > ++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++
    > Director of Standards Development, New Context
    > gpg fingerprint: 3918 9D7E 50F5 088F 823F  018A 831A 270A 6C4F C338
    > ++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++
    > --
    > "No matter how hard you try, you can't make a baby in much less than 9
    > months. Trying to speed this up *might* make it slower, but it won't
    > make it happen any quicker." --RFC 1925