[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [cti-stix] FW: [cti] Location - precision, altitude, and administrative area
Do those use cases really use altitude in feet off ground, or are they just an address that has a floor associated with it? I definitely agree we want to allow people to put a floor number in street address, but this proposal was for something
alongside lat/lng to say it’s 50ft above MSL or whatever. From: Allan Thomson <athomson@lookingglasscyber.com> All – Whether you agree or disagree with the number of organizations interested in altitude representation in location there are use cases that it helps solve. As stated previously, any large city with skyscrapers (NY, London, Signapore….etc) or enterprise (Fortune 500) that have many different floors and typically multi-tenant environments, then being able to determine location of related intelligence
associated with a particular floor is a valid use case. I don’t think organizations that don’t care about this use case should necessarily make decisions to exclude the ability for the standard to support altitude. Is there really a big impact to the velocity of STIX2.1 location efforts by not having altitude as an option? I suggest there’s minimal impact to *allowing* altitude as an option in the location object if a provider wants to include it as an option property. From: "cti-stix@lists.oasis-open.org" <cti-stix@lists.oasis-open.org> on behalf of Terry MacDonald <terry.macdonald@cosive.com> I agree with Sarah. I believe that altitude is only useful to a very small group, and the 80/20 rule will apply in this case. Cheers Terry MacDonald Cosive On 25/07/2017 7:44 AM, "Sarah Kelley" <Sarah.Kelley@cisecurity.org> wrote:
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]