Re: [cti-stix] Question on Versioning with 2.1

["Wunder, John A." <jwunder@mitre.org>]

I agree with Allan and Trey. As much as I would like STIX to just be a serialization and you can serialize as whatever version, we have object lifecycle stuff in the specification and therefore this is important.

On 4/9/18, 5:14 AM, "Trey Darley" <cti-stix@lists.oasis-open.org on behalf of trey@newcontext.com> wrote:

   
    On 06.04.2018 20:37:27, Allan Thomson wrote:
    > 
    > So I come to the conclusion for consistency/sync reasons I think it
    > is best to require a change to the modified timestamp even in the
    > case where the only change is 2.0 to 2.1 schema.
    > 
    
    I concur with Allan's assessment.
    
    -- 
    Cheers,
    Trey
    ++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++
    Director of Standards Development, New Context
    gpg fingerprint: 3918 9D7E 50F5 088F 823F  018A 831A 270A 6C4F C338
    ++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++
    --
    "There are two types of people: those who fit into my taxonomy and
    those who do not." --anonymous