Re: [cti-taxii] Backwards compatibility with TAXII 1.1 in discovery

[Eric Burger <Eric.Burger@georgetown.edu>]

Does anyone use TAXII 1.x? If the answer is No, you have your answer. If the answer is Yes, but only for experimental use, then you have an indication of an answer. If the answer is Yes, then we have to ask if our reputation of ripping out everything you think works right when you start using it will be yet again reinforced, to the point that sensible people will stop hitting their head against the wall and use RID instead.

On Oct 9, 2016, at 5:59 PM, Bret Jordan (CS) <Bret_Jordan@symantec.com> wrote:

Should TAXII 2.0 provide support for advertising TAXII 1.1.1 services via the new TAXII 2.0 Discovery API?  If it should, then we need to try and figure out what that would look like and how that would work.  

Personally I question the value of this for an MVP release of TAXII 2.0.  I also question the need of a TAXII 2.0 implementer to advertise services that are running under TAXII 1.1.1...  

I am curious to know your thoughts.  

Bret

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail