Yes, it’s used and its non-experimental. I can think of both commercial and government entities that are making use of it today.
Paul Patrick
From:
<cti-taxii@lists.oasis-open.org>, Eric Burger <ewb25@georgetown.edu> on behalf of Eric Burger <Eric.Burger@georgetown.edu>
Date: Monday, October 10, 2016 at 6:51 AM
To: "cti-taxii@lists.oasis-open.org" <cti-taxii@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject: Re: [cti-taxii] Backwards compatibility with TAXII 1.1 in discovery
Does anyone use TAXII 1.x? If the answer is No, you have your answer. If the answer is Yes, but only for experimental use, then you have an indication of an answer. If the answer is Yes, then we have to ask if our
reputation of ripping out everything you think works right when you start using it will be yet again reinforced, to the point that sensible people will stop hitting their head against the wall and use RID instead.
Should TAXII 2.0 provide support for advertising TAXII 1.1.1 services via the new TAXII 2.0 Discovery API? If it should, then we need to try and figure out what that would look
like and how that would work.
Personally I question the value of this for an MVP release of TAXII 2.0. I also question the need of a TAXII 2.0 implementer to advertise services that are running under TAXII
1.1.1...
I am curious to know your thoughts.
This email and any attachments thereto may contain private, confidential, and/or privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, copying, or distribution of this email (or any attachments thereto) by others is strictly prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copies of this email and any attachments thereto.