cti-taxii message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Errata in TAXII spec around allowed collection ID formats.
- From: "Jason Keirstead" <Jason.Keirstead@ca.ibm.com>
- To: cti-taxii@lists.oasis-open.org
- Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 10:19:14 -0300
I should be more clear...
This is in the 2.0 spec. The 2.1 spec
does not have this "problem", it has UUIDs everywhere.
Which implies that some of the examples
in the 2.0 spec, are not valid in 2.1
-
Jason Keirstead
Lead Architect - IBM.Security
www.ibm.com/security
"Things may come to those who wait, but only the things left by those
who hustle." - Unknown
__________________
I have found errata in the TAXII spec
The TAXII spec defines the ID of the
collection resource to be of type "identifier", which, at the
start of the document, is defined as having to be a UUID. However, numerous
examples throughout the specification show a collection ID having a common
string name such as "my-collection".
Is it allowed for a TAXII collection
to have a common name as an ID? Or do they all have to be UUIDS
This has ramifications for people wanting
to create special read-only or write-only collections that serve as things
like an Inbox.
-
Jason Keirstead
Lead Architect - IBM.Security
www.ibm.com/security
"Things may come to those who wait, but only the things left by those
who hustle." - Unknown
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]