[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [cti-users] Re: Research Paper
|
I do like this because it separates conceptual design from implementation, but I have a bit of a knowledge gap in the OWL area. Question – How would we get from
this sort of thinking to implementation (which is of course still important)? From: cti-users@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:cti-users@lists.oasis-open.org]
On Behalf Of Shawn Riley Hi folks, I've had a few people follow up asking where they could learn more about knowledge engineering and semantic web technologies since that was a key focus on the science of cybersecurity
research paper. I just learned of a new Massively Open Online Course (MOOC) on Knowledge Engineering and Semantic Web Technologies that is FREE and open to everyone! I posted more information in a couple blogs posts for those interested. I know there are a
number of us in the STIX, CYBOX, MSM community focused on the knowledge engineering side using semantic web technologies so while this is slightly off topic, I hope you find this information of value. LinkedIn PeerLyst On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 7:43 AM, Shawn Riley <shawn.p.riley@gmail.com> wrote: Hi Folks, Back in 2012 when STIX was released, the white paper included a mention of other possible implementations such as semantic web (OWL/RDF) and JSON-centric. We've had Bret share details on his
JSON efforts with the list so I wanted to take the opportunity to share our research paper on using semantic web technologies (OWL/RDF) with the group. This isn't marketing as there is no company or product mentioned. Rather, we're just sharing knowledge based
on our international research efforts. Given the ongoing debate over XML vs JSON, we thought it would also be good to show how both of these could be supported using the semantic technology approach. In many ways our research "connected the dots" between existing cybersecurity efforts across different government agencies that have been identified by the government as the way forward. From
the Science of Security championed by National Security Agency and National Science Foundation, to the Cybersecurity Measurement and Management Architecture championed by the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Defense, and the revolutionary
intelligence methodologies (object-based production / activity-based intelligence) championed by the Intelligence Community and particularly the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency. While each of these cybersecurity and intelligence efforts can stand on its own and provide great benefit, bringing these efforts together demonstrates how each agency's investments can see
a greater return on investment by working together to develop scientific foundations for the operational cybersecurity ecosystem. Just like we need infrastructure in areas like Meteorology to understand and predict the weather we need operational cybersecurity
science infrastructure to understand and predict events in our cyber ecosystem of the future. The paper can be downloaded from LinkedIn's Slideshare. Best, Shawn Shawn Riley Executive Vice President Centre for Strategic Cyberspace + Security Science London, England, UK - Washington, DC, USA DTCC DISCLAIMER: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error, please notify us immediately and delete the email and any attachments from your system. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]