Thanks for the opportunity to weigh in. I apologize in advance if my comment comes across as contrarian. Blame it on my newness to this group.
Side note: The GitHub wiki is not optimal for threaded discussions. On a call yesterday, I thought someone mentioned Atlassian Confluence. Is that a possibility, or is there another OASIS-sponsored forum where we could carry on discussions?
JSA
Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2015 9:17 AM
To: Cory Casanave
Cc: Jordan, Bret; cti-stix@lists.oasis-open.org; cti-users@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [cti-stix] Re: [cti-users] MTI Binding
|
|
MTI Format Analysis · STIXProject/schemas Wiki · GitHub
schemas - STIX Schema Development
|
On Sep 30, 2015, at 8:20 PM, Cory Casanave <cory-c@modeldriven.com> wrote:
What about RDF in JSON? This then has a well defined schema.
From: cti-users@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:cti-users@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of Jordan, Bret
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 6:56 PM
To: cti-stix@lists.oasis-open.org; cti-users@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [cti-users] MTI Binding
From the comments so far on the github wiki [1], the consensus right now from the community is for JSON to be used as the MTI (mandatory to implement) binding for STIX. For those that agree or disagree or have a different opinion, please update at least the final Conclusions section with your opinion.
[1] https://github.com/STIXProject/schemas/wiki/MTI-Format-Analysis
Thanks,
Bret
Bret Jordan CISSP
Director of Security Architecture and Standards | Office of the CTO
Blue Coat Systems
PGP Fingerprint: 63B4 FC53 680A 6B7D 1447 F2C0 74F8 ACAE 7415 0050
"Without cryptography vihv vivc ce xhrnrw, however, the only thing that can not be unscrambled is an egg."