Re: [cti-users] [cti-stix] [cti-users] MTI Binding

["Jacobsen, Jasen W." <jasenj1@mitre.org>]

It would also be useful to see the UML models and/or semantic models used. Abstract->representation->instance. There are some advocating the use of fairly advanced/sophisticated/complex modeling tools and then generating everything else algorithmically. A bite size example may help those who are not steeped in the practice of that craft and tools.

I believe many here are not professional ontologists and data modelers.

- Jasen.

From: <cti-users@lists.oasis-open.org> on behalf of Terry MacDonald <terry.macdonald@threatloop.com>
Date: Friday, October 2, 2015 at 5:56 PM
To: "Jordan, Bret" <bret.jordan@bluecoat.com>
Cc: "Wunder, John A." <jwunder@mitre.org>, "cti-stix@lists.oasis-open.org" <cti-stix@lists.oasis-open.org>, "cti-users@lists.oasis-open.org" <cti-users@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject: [cti-users] [cti-stix] [cti-users] MTI Binding

+1. Is a nice idea as we can see a size and complexity comparison. Is there any chance each person can document the process that the generation took? I'm thinking it could be useful to see how complicated the toolchain for developing each type of output is.

Cheers
Terry MacDonald

> On 3 Oct 2015 6:33 am, "Jordan, Bret" <bret.jordan@bluecoat.com> wrote:
>>
>> I think this is a great idea..  
>>
>>