[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [cti-users] RE: [Non-DoD Source] [cti-users] STIX 2.0 expected CS approval date
-------- Original Message --------Subject: [cti-users] RE: [Non-DoD Source] [cti-users] STIX 2.0 expected CS approval dateLocal Time: 14 mars 2017 9:47 PMUTC Time: 14 mars 2017 18:47From: Elihu.E.El@nga.milTo: Richard.vandenBerg@ncsc.nl, cti-users@lists.oasis-open.orgClassification: UNCLASSIFIED======================================================Hello,Question - Are we adding the Latitude, Longitude, and Elevation properties to the STIX components in 2.0???Warm Regards,EliElihu Eli El, Scrum, Safe Agile, ITILSystems EngineerNGA DOGUnclassified: 571-558-4351Secure: 579-4351Elihu.E.El@nga.milGSM: https://www.geoint.community/-----Original Message-----From: cti-users@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:cti-users@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of Richard van den Berg (NCSC-NL)Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 1:06 PMTo: cti-users@lists.oasis-open.orgSubject: [Non-DoD Source] [cti-users] STIX 2.0 expected CS approval dateThis email was sent from a non-Department of Defense email account, and contained active links. Please verify the identity of the sender, and confirm authenticity of all links contained within the message.This email was sent from a non-Department of Defense email account, and contained active links. Please verify the identity of the sender, and confirm authenticity of all links contained within the message.Dear list,We are starting the process to add STIX/TAXII to the "comply or explain" list of the Dutch government. We are aiming to add STIX 2.0, but the current Committee Specification Draft status might be an issue. I understand STIX 2.0 is currently in the Public Review stage since 24 February[1]. Is there an expected CS approval date for STIX 2.0? I see that for STIX 1.2.1 it took 5 months to get from Public Review[2] to Committee Specification approval[3]. Is that a fair timeline to work with for STIX 2.0?Additional, does it make any sense use STIX 2.0 in combination with TAXII 1.1.1 ? Because the CS approval date for TAXII 2.0 will most certainly be after our new "comply or explain" list is published (as it is lagging 2 months behind STIX 2.0 in the process).[1]: Caution-issues.oasis-open.org/browse/TCADMIN-2544[2]: Caution-issues.oasis-open.org/browse/TCADMIN-2266[3]: Caution-www.oasis-open.org/committees/ballot.php?id=2928Kind regards,Richard van den Berg............................................................................Nationaal Cyber Security CentrumPostbus 117 | 2501 CC| Den Haag | Caution-www.ncsc.nl<Caution-www.ncsc.nl/>............................................................................T 070 888 7555 (algemeen)M 06 5207 1109E richard.vandenberg@ncsc.nl<mailto:richard.vandenberg@ncsc.nl>PGP 46FD 20E0 8257 9081 81A9 5254 A7A3 6869 5D24 D3B6 ............................................................................Bezoekadres:Turfmarkt 147 | 2511 DP | Den Haag======================================================Classification: UNCLASSIFIEDThis publicly archived list provides a forum for asking questions,offering answers, and discussing topics of interest on STIX,TAXII, and CybOX. Users and developers of solutions that leverageSTIX, TAXII and CybOX are invited to participate.In order to verify user consent to OASIS mailing list guidelinesand to minimize spam in the list archive, subscription is requiredbefore posting.Subscribe: cti-users-subscribe@lists.oasis-open.orgUnsubscribe: cti-users-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.orgPost: cti-users@lists.oasis-open.orgList help: cti-users-help@lists.oasis-open.orgList archive: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cti-users/List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.phpCTI Technical Committee: https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/cti/Join OASIS: http://www.oasis-open.org/join/
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]