[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [cti] Inviting nominations for Chair of Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI) TC,
I like how this proposal balances the desire of some in the community to have Rich continue his role as shepherd along with a term limit on the role of chair.
The six month time period where we have a chair alone seems prudent too – we may need even a year to figure out the right organizational roles and responsibilities. == down in the weeds == I support the idea of a co-chair, because I like the idea of a permanent succession plan in the event that x, y or z thing happens involving the Chair. However,
I am not sure whether or not the co-chair should automatically be the chair in such an event. I support the criteria Trey came up with below, understanding why #3 should be optional. I must admit that personally I hope for the emergence of strong non-US
leaders to champion the standards. I think we would be wise, before we vote for such a person or persons, to figure out exactly what the co-chair(s) will be responsible for as it relates to the structure of the organization, our committees and our decision
making process. We might be just as successful having a small group of individuals to counter the power of the chair. However, I defer to others on the veto / override function, hopefully there are existing best practices for such a situation. Thanks, Alex From: cti@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:cti@lists.oasis-open.org]
On Behalf Of Trey Darley Hey, y'all - There's seems to be clear consensus on Rich for CTI chair. I think everyone agrees that Rich has done yeoman’s work overseeing and nurturing the development
of these emerging standards over the past several years. The shift to OASIS is pretty huge. We don't want too much change all at once. I've been participating in these discussions for a couple of years now. Just in the past couple of weeks, it's been remarkable all the new names popping
up on the mailing lists. Based on what I've seen since the transition to OASIS was announced, I'm willing to bet that the CTI community _doubles_ over the course of the next six months. I propose the following compromise: 0) We have Rich act as sole chair during the six month period immediately following the initial round of voting. 1) We institute a one-year term on all chair positions. 2) We give the chair a veto on co-chair candidates and require a 60% majority to override the chair's veto. Beyond that, I think the four essential criteria already spelled out are valuable considerations but needn't be formalized. Cheers, Trey -- Trey Darley Senior Security Engineer Soltra | An FS-ISAC & DTCC Company +32/494.766.080 | trey@soltra.com www.soltra.com From: Peter Allor <pallor@us.ibm.com> Trey,
<snip>
This message, and any attachments, is for the intended recipient(s) only, may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or proprietary and subject to important terms and conditions available at http://www.bankofamerica.com/emaildisclaimer. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message. |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]