[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [cti] Thoughts on STIX and some of the other threads on this list
I agree, and obviously having only one reference implementation is the only reasonable approach. I was trying to present the alternative as the counterpoint to "If we abstract out the complexity what we have to ‘learn’ is a set of API calls. This is how modern software is built – Not on data formats but on API formats. / ". Obviously if we have only one reference implementation, the complexity and data format *IS* highly relevant, because it means other vendors will have to implement it.
-
Jason Keirstead
Product Architect, Security Intelligence, IBM Security Systems
www.ibm.com/security | www.securityintelligence.com
Without data, all you are is just another person with an opinion - Unknown
"Kirillov, Ivan A." ---2015/08/31 11:26:56 AM---What about having just python-stix/cybox serve as the reference implementation? I guess I just don’t
From: "Kirillov, Ivan A." <ikirillov@mitre.org>
To: "Bush, Jonathan" <jbush@dtcc.com>, Jason Keirstead/CanEast/IBM@IBMCA
Cc: "'Jordan, Bret'" <bret.jordan@bluecoat.com>, Aharon Chernin <achernin@soltra.com>, Mark Clancy <mclancy@soltra.com>, "cti@lists.oasis-open.org" <cti@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date: 2015/08/31 11:26 AM
Subject: Re: [cti] Thoughts on STIX and some of the other threads on this list
<trimmed>
[attachment "image001.gif" deleted by Jason Keirstead/CanEast/IBM]
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]