[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [cti] Quality of the specs
Thinking forward to STIX 2.0, how would we address Mark C's’s concerns in STIX 2.0 to make sure we don’t repeat the same mistakes?
[Sorry for the inevitable mangling of formatting that Outlook for mac will do to this]
What else? Are there other problems in 1.2 that we can try to head off in 2.0?
For 1.2, these are things we tried to address via the idioms. They have examples and descriptions for most of these topics. Will people be more likely to read a top 5 than our giant list? It would be easy enough to create a
new page for “things not to do in STIX 1.2”.
John
From: <cti@lists.oasis-open.org>, Eric Burger <ewb25@georgetown.edu> on behalf of Eric Burger <Eric.Burger@georgetown.edu>
Date: Friday, February 5, 2016 at 7:17 AM To: "cti@lists.oasis-open.org" <cti@lists.oasis-open.org> Subject: Re: [cti] Quality of the specs
The suggested practices page is a good start for an implementor’s guide. However, looking at Mark C.’s list, I do not think anyone would easily see where they went wrong.
Maybe a version or section on the page that reads like the SANS 20? Mark C.’s top five, with their corresponding “right ways” would go a long way.
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]