OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

cti message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: RE: [cti] Consensus Achieved on 2 topics

On these two items, I don’t think there is much remaining controversy – and the normative write-up are pretty straightforward.  (IMHO)


For others like patterns and versioning, I think you are probably correct.  Of course, there is a trade-off since this will impact the aggressive tranche schedule…


From: cti@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:cti@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of Patrick Maroney
Sent: Monday, February 15, 2016 10:34 AM
To: Piazza, Rich <rpiazza@mitre.org>; cti@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [cti] Consensus Achieved on 2 topics


(1) I want to first state that I fully support the "Push for Progress".  


(2) An aggressive schedule (1-2 Business Days) for review and comments on draft normative text might work well for those who can dedicate full-time attention to this process (including time to dig out and review potentially 100s-1,000s of related Slack Channel comments).  


(3) However, propose to the community that this is too aggressive in my view to give active contributors with full time responsibilities outside of the CTI TC to review, engage, and comment.  


(4) Can we agree on some reasonable period to review, engage, and comment?

  (4.1) One week?

  (4.2) Two weeks?

  (4.3) ???



Patrick Maroney

Office:  (856)983-0001

Cell:      (609)841-5104




Integrated Networking Technologies, Inc.

PO Box 569

Marlton, NJ 08053


From: "cti@lists.oasis-open.org" <cti@lists.oasis-open.org> on behalf of Richard Piazza <rpiazza@mitre.org>
Date: Monday, February 15, 2016 at 10:09 AM
To: "cti@lists.oasis-open.org" <cti@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject: [cti] Consensus Achieved on 2 topics


The issues “Flatten package lists” and “CTI Core Properties” have draft normative text that has been available to review since Friday.


Assuming there are no comments or questions about them today – I will mark them as “Consensus Achieved” on the wiki pages, and close the Github issue at COB today.


The issue “Refactor Report Objects” has produced some discussion on the CTI list, so it will remain open for now.





Rich Piazza

The MITRE Corporation




[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]