[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [cti] CybOX Datatype Refactoring/Deprecation
|
As was discussed on the call, things that are going to be “left out” going forward, need to be called out – it could be in the spec, but probably we could use
some release notes. Starting them now (as a google doc), as we make these decisions, would probably be the best way to capture all of our reasoning/discussions. BTW - If we don’t have any specific best practices to suggest, that’s ok. In other words, having a defanging normative standard would not be necessary. Simply
say: “Any defanging is left as an implementation detail.” From: cti@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:cti@lists.oasis-open.org]
On Behalf Of Wunder, John A. If that’s what you’re saying, I agree. If users and vendors think it’s useful, I could see a group like us defining best practices for
defanging data in the UI. |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]