[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Documents
Right now, we have three documents for STIX & CybOX, aka CTI. We have: CTI Common 1.0 STIX 2.0 CybOX 3.0 I would like to challenge this design. It seems like we are opening ourselves to document versioning and compliance / interoperability nightmares. 1) Does it really make sense, other than for historical reasons, to keep these documents separate? 2) If they were merged, then could not things like MAEC and other standards (that are NOT part of OASIS) just reference the sections that were of interest to them? Thanks, Bret Bret Jordan CISSP Director of Security Architecture and Standards | Office of the CTO Blue Coat Systems PGP Fingerprint: 63B4 FC53 680A 6B7D 1447 F2C0 74F8 ACAE 7415 0050 "Without cryptography vihv vivc ce xhrnrw, however, the only thing that can not be unscrambled is an egg." |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]