[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [cti] Question Gathering: Relationship Preservation in Versioning (Implicit vs Explicit)
On 21.03.2016 11:40:42, Jason Keirstead wrote: > > To copy/paste/revise something I sent in a Slack earlier today... > That was Jason schooling me on Slack. ^_^ > > When I look at the actual use cases for intel.. I think people will > usually want the latest. I am at a bit of a loss why everyone > assumes that people will essentially want “stale” info by default. > Based on discussions I had yesterday, I'm reversing my previously-stated position. While there might be edge cases where you'd want a relationship to be pinned to a specific object revision, the default mode for relationship should be to always point to the latest revision. -- Cheers, Trey -- Trey Darley Senior Security Engineer 4DAA 0A88 34BC 27C9 FD2B A97E D3C6 5C74 0FB7 E430 Soltra | An FS-ISAC & DTCC Company www.soltra.com -- "It is always possible to aglutenate multiple separate problems into a single complex interdependent solution. In most cases this is a bad idea." --RFC 1925
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]