[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [cti] Verisoning Discussion @ CTI Working Discussion
It seems like another important topic is is versioning MVP (should we include it in STIX 2.0, or wait until 2.1+)?
I know that the working group leaders believe that it is, but it seems like we should talk through that as a group before digging into these deeper topics just in case the community as a whole feels differently.
From: <email@example.com> on behalf of Marlon Taylor <Marlon.Taylor@hq.dhs.gov>
Date: Monday, March 28, 2016 at 10:38 AM
To: "firstname.lastname@example.org" <email@example.com>
Subject: [cti] Verisoning Discussion @ CTI Working Discussion
During the CTI call tomorrow we will discuss versioning, more specifically implicit vs explicit relationships. During this discussion it will be beneficial to identify:
· What’s the difference?
o With Implicit Relationships - as a version is updated, the relationships of the former as passed along to the latter.
o With Explicit Relationships - as a version is updated, it is new with no prior relationships.
· Is there any use-case/rationale for either?
o Arguably one can state they both can result in a version update where the relationships of the former exist in the latter.
· Should they be mutually exclusive?
Please join the call tomorrow to learn about and contribute to this topic.
Feel free to use this thread as a notebook for your views/questions/ideas for tomorrow’s discussion.
Technology Services Section (TSS)
National Cybersecurity & Communications Integration Center (NCCIC)
U.S. Department of Homeland Security