OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

cti message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [cti] Verisoning Discussion @ CTI Working Discussion


I also back this decision. I am more worried about the consequences of missing something and doing it wrong, than about ramifications of not including it.
-
Jason Keirstead
STSM, Product Architect, Security Intelligence, IBM Security Systems
www.ibm.com/security | www.securityintelligence.com

Without data, all you are is just another person with an opinion - Unknown


Inactive hide details for Mark Davidson ---03/29/2016 08:16:51 AM---I’d like to second this so that we can have a clear CTI TCMark Davidson ---03/29/2016 08:16:51 AM---I’d like to second this so that we can have a clear CTI TC-wide view of opinions on this matter. I c

From: Mark Davidson <mdavidson@soltra.com>
To: "Foley, Alexander - GIS" <alexander.foley@bankofamerica.com>, "Wunder, John A." <jwunder@mitre.org>, "cti@lists.oasis-open.org" <cti@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date: 03/29/2016 08:16 AM
Subject: Re: [cti] Verisoning Discussion @ CTI Working Discussion
Sent by: <cti@lists.oasis-open.org>





I’d like to second this so that we can have a clear CTI TC-wide view of opinions on this matter. I care more about making a decision than I do the specific outcome.

Thank you.
-Mark

From: <cti@lists.oasis-open.org> on behalf of "Foley, Alexander - GIS" <alexander.foley@bankofamerica.com>
Date:
Monday, March 28, 2016 at 5:56 PM
To:
"Wunder, John A." <jwunder@mitre.org>, "cti@lists.oasis-open.org" <cti@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject:
RE: [cti] Verisoning Discussion @ CTI Working Discussion

I motion that we do not consider including versioning as part of STIX 2.0, and instead wait for 2.1+ to implement it.

I’m not trying to say that we shouldn’t prepare for it, I just don’t believe we’re going to solve this issue in the next three months given the many other issues we need to figure out.

Thanks,

Alex Foley

From: cti@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:cti@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of Wunder, John A.
Sent:
Monday, March 28, 2016 1:58 PM
To:
cti@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject:
Re: [cti] Verisoning Discussion @ CTI Working Discussion

It seems like another important topic is is versioning MVP (should we include it in STIX 2.0, or wait until 2.1+)?

I know that the working group leaders believe that it is, but it seems like we should talk through that as a group before digging into these deeper topics just in case the community as a whole feels differently.

From: <cti@lists.oasis-open.org> on behalf of Marlon Taylor <Marlon.Taylor@hq.dhs.gov>
Date:
Monday, March 28, 2016 at 10:38 AM
To:
"cti@lists.oasis-open.org" <cti@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject:
[cti] Verisoning Discussion @ CTI Working Discussion

Hi All,

During the CTI call tomorrow we will discuss versioning, more specifically implicit vs explicit relationships. During this discussion it will be beneficial to identify:
Please join the call tomorrow to learn about and contribute to this topic.

Feel free to use this thread as a notebook for your views/questions/ideas for tomorrow’s discussion.

Marlon Taylor
Technology Services Section (TSS)
National Cybersecurity & Communications Integration Center (NCCIC)
U.S. Department of Homeland Security


This message, and any attachments, is for the intended recipient(s) only, may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or proprietary and subject to important terms and conditions available at http://www.bankofamerica.com/emaildisclaimer. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message.




[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]