[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [cti] [cti-stix] MISP Taxonomies [Was: CTI Brussels F2F Meeting...RSVP deadline 5 September]
Hi all
Few extra thoughts:
- Reliability of Source and other similar evaluation methods used across types of Intelligence are not meant to provide "specific quantification" but rather to “inform” with certain degree of error margin. Then, it’s up to analysts, consumers
(human, products) or policy makers (stakeholders) to “interpret” this and eventually make decisions or informed actions.
- It should be up to specific Technology Products to implement how mapping of this and other evaluation methods or scores into specific numbers actually works when and if needed. I can imagine that end users would want to be able to fine tune
this “formulas” based on specific use cases.
Thanks,
Marko Dragoljevic
VP Technology, Chief Architect marko@eclecticiq.com +31 643 919 496 EclecticIQ Intelligence Powered Defense https://www.eclecticiq.com
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]