OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

cti message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [cti-stix] Re: [cti] Proposal of confidence level using MISP taxonomies


I hate to channel my inner Rumsfeld, but there actually is a difference between an unknown value and a known unknown value.

If we declare that -1 is a valid value in the standard, then people should not be declaring it as an unsigned type. And in JSON, Number types are always signed so it's a non issue there...

-
Jason Keirstead
STSM, Product Architect, Security Intelligence, IBM Security Systems
www.ibm.com/security | www.securityintelligence.com

Without data, all you are is just another person with an opinion - Unknown


Inactive hide details for Andras Iklody ---09/12/2016 02:54:27 PM----1 could get tricky if someone blindly inserts it using unsAndras Iklody ---09/12/2016 02:54:27 PM----1 could get tricky if someone blindly inserts it using unsigned data types. Not setting a value if

From: Andras Iklody <andras.iklody@gmail.com>
To: Jason Keirstead/CanEast/IBM@IBMCA
Cc: OASIS CTI TC Discussion List <cti@lists.oasis-open.org>, cti-stix@lists.oasis-open.org, Alexandre Dulaunoy <Alexandre.Dulaunoy@circl.lu>
Date: 09/12/2016 02:54 PM
Subject: Re: [cti-stix] Re: [cti] Proposal of confidence level using MISP taxonomies





-1 could get tricky if someone blindly inserts it using unsigned data types. Not setting a value if it is unknown sounds a bit cleaner.


On Sep 12, 2016 7:09 PM, "Jason Keirstead" <Jason.Keirstead@ca.ibm.com> wrote:




[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]