[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: version proposed change to STIX 2.0 RC3
We agree with this proposal with Marlon’s amendment. From: cti@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:cti@lists.oasis-open.org]
On Behalf Of Allan Thomson Hey Marlon – that was exactly the intent and I remember reading/reviewing text that says so. I’ll double check and make sure that change is clear.
allan From: "Taylor, Marlon" <Marlon.Taylor@hq.dhs.gov> Would the author of the proposal yield to an amendment? If so, add “When the object is initially created the modified time and created time MUST match”. I yield my time. -Marlon From:
cti@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:cti@lists.oasis-open.org]
On Behalf Of Struse, Richard FYI - I agree with Allan’s proposed changes on version and thank Allan and his developers for their efforts on this!
From:
cti@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:cti@lists.oasis-open.org]
On Behalf Of Allan Thomson All – As agreed on the last working call I was asked to send the proposed text changes for the version number proposal. See the attached deck for intro. Proposal: Remove version number and rely on created/modified timestamps to provide the versioning information. Rationale: Implementers more easily can generate versioning. I made changes to Part 1 and Part 2 (not attached). If anyone wants to see Part 2 changes (primarily changes to STIX objects property tables to be consistent with change to version property) let me know and
I can send the doc. Allan |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]