Re: [cti] timestamp proposal for STIX 2.0 RC3

["Wunder, John A." <jwunder@mitre.org>]

Hi Eric, all,

A couple other people had the same problem so I uploaded the attachment here: https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/59509/numerical-timestamp-prop.pdf

John

On 12/5/16, 11:47 AM, ", Eric Burger on behalf of Eric Burger" <cti@lists.oasis-open.orgewb25@georgetown.edu on behalf of Eric.Burger@georgetown.edu> wrote:

    The attachment came across as the ubiquitous winmail.dat. What’s the attachment supposed to be?
    
    > On Dec 1, 2016, at 5:19 PM, Allan Thomson <athomson@lookingglasscyber.com> wrote:
    > 
    > Hi All – As discussed on the working call on Tuesday I took the action to come back with an updated proposal on how to represent timestamps numerically instead of requiring the string representation as is currently defined in STIX 2.0 RC3.
    > 
    > Please find attached the proposal(s).
    > 
    > Proposal #1 is the preferred approach but including 2 options for consideration to see if others have a different preference.
    > 
    > Thanks to the Greg Back from the Mitre team for doing some quick performance testing on string vs numerical based timestamp processing. I’ve included the results in the slide deck for support.
    > 
    > Regards
    > 
    > Allan
    > <winmail.dat>
    > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
    > generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
    > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php