I second this. The current approach is workable and we should move on to more important topics.
On 12/7/16, 1:47 PM, "Trey Darley" <cti@lists.oasis-open.org on behalf of trey@kingfisherops.com> wrote:
In consideration of the fact that the interminable timestamp
discussion has resurfaced without a clear end in sight, in the
interest of releasing STIX 2.0 in a timely fashion, I hereby motion to
open a ballot to keep STIX timestamps exactly as currently defined in
the RC3 draft specification. Furthermore, as there appears to be
strong consensus within the TC that we should lifeboat timestamp
precision as currently defined in the RC3 draft specification, I
motion to remove timestamp precision but reserve the
'timestamp-precision' keyword for future use.
Can I get a second to the motion?
--
Cheers,
Trey
++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++
Kingfisher Operations, sprl
gpg fingerprint: 85F3 5F54 4A2A B4CD 33C4 5B9B B30D DD6E 62C8 6C1D
++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++
--
"All systems, regardless of composition, do one of three things: blow
up, oscillate, or stay about the same." --anonymous