Re: [cti] Internationalization: lang field required or optional?

[Trey Darley <trey@kingfisherops.com>]

On 01.03.2017 02:25:37, Bret Jordan wrote:
> 
> If we make it required, then we might get some people doing stupid
> stuff and defaulting it to "en". But how is that different or worse
> then what we have today? Further, I think we can use the RFC but
> say, in the event that you do not know the language, you MUST use
> "und". No need to go to the ISO version. We can use these RFCs how
> ever we want.
> 

+1

-- 
Cheers,
Trey
++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++
Kingfisher Operations, sprl
gpg fingerprint: 85F3 5F54 4A2A B4CD 33C4  5B9B B30D DD6E 62C8 6C1D
++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++
--
"There is more simplicity in the man who eats caviar on impulse than
in the man who eats Grape-Nuts on principle." --G.K. Chesterton

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature