[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [cti] Current status on Confidence, Intel Note, and Opinion
On 30/03/17 20:19, Patrick Maroney wrote: > .02: > > Re: Subjective Measures > > Since we evidently have consensus on the 0-100 scale for confidence, we should adopt this representation for all subjective measures, assertions, etc. We should be able to apply consistent methods to process these mathematically/statistically. We are also already in-line with the various MISP taxonomies representation with the 0-100 scale. This is pretty much what we had in mind when we faced a similar decision. Ultimately we ended up using a similar 0-100 scale as described here: https://github.com/MISP/misp-taxonomies/blob/master/misp/machinetag.json#L40 We strongly favour this consensus too. > > Example: > > An "opinion" is an assertion by an entity. Like all subjective measures, one might want/need to assign a weight/scaling factor to an "opinion" on the basis of the receiving entities rating for this source (or sources in the aggregate). > > Therefore, if we adopt a common scale and numeric representation for all of these subjective types of measures and representations, we can easily calculate (e.g., sum, average, std deviation), weight, aggregate, etc. True. Cheers. -- Alexandre Dulaunoy CIRCL - Computer Incident Response Center Luxembourg 41, avenue de la gare L-1611 Luxembourg info@circl.lu - www.circl.lu
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]