Re: [cti] Re: [EXT] [cti] Location as a Top-Level SDO

[John-Mark Gurney <jmg@newcontext.com>]

Back, Greg wrote this message on Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 20:18 +0000:
> If Location is an SDO, does that make it possible to “move” another object by versioning the Location object? That seems like a bad idea. Especially if you effectively “move” other, unrelated objects that also refer to the same Location. Even if we did make Location a TLO, we would have to mandate that people update the “_ref” fields to move an SDO, not the Location itself.
> 
> (I haven’t made up my mind on whether I like the Location SDO in general, just pointing out one consideration).

Interesting point.  Which effectively means that if you create a
relationship to a location, that location should be one you own, not
one that was created by someone else (unless you can trust the creator
not to do what you just described)...

This means that by definition, there will be many Location SDO's for
the same location to prevent this from happeneing...

-- 
John-Mark