Thanks to everyone who have done the hard work of trying to drive related discourse to consensus.
For those of us unable to directly participate in these discussions, it would be very helpful to have the specific reference links to same going forward. This would enable those wishing to offer views the ability to fully understand how we got to these consensus positions.
Is it safe to presume this related discourse can be found in the Slack Channels for these topics, working group meeting notes, or a some combination of these records? Patrick Maroney Principal Engineer - Data Science & Analytics (609)841-5104
On tomorrow’s working call, we will be addressing several topics that need TC consensus for moving forward with STIX 2.0 and STIX 2.1. In preparation for the meeting, please review the following:
STIX 2.0:
- The second open comment period for STIX 2.0 has closed. The suggested changes have been addressed on working calls, and the current decision on each item has
been documented in the following spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1YOPONeKzc6Uu1A1MS3WkICG26LKLQOWdr-KBDzM8K6Y/edit#gid=5055878
- The TC needs to fully approve these changes before we can consider STIX 2.0 CSD to be done. There were no substantive changes made during this comment period,
so if the TC agrees to the decisions documented in the spreadsheet above, we can vote to move forward from a Committee Specification Draft (CSD) to a Committee Specification (CS).
- ACTION ITEM: Please review the spreadsheet. If you have
any objections to the decisions as listed, please comment either on the list or at the full TC meeting tomorrow. Lack of comment is considered to be agreement.
STIX 2.1
- Intel Note is ready to be moved from the STIX Working Document to the STIX 2.1 Specification Document. As such,
we agreed to open each item up for approval of the full TC. The current proposal is located here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/15qD9KBQcVcY4FlG9n_VGhqacaeiLlNcQ7zVEjc8I3b4/edit#heading=h.s5l7katgbp09
- ACTION ITEM: Please review this proposal. If you have any
objections to the proposal as written, please comment either on the list or at the full TC meeting tomorrow. Lack of comment is considered to be agreement with the proposal as written.
- Opinion is ready to be moved from the STIX Working Document to the STIX 2.1 Specification Document. As such, we
agreed to open each item up for approval of the full TC. The current proposal is located here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/15qD9KBQcVcY4FlG9n_VGhqacaeiLlNcQ7zVEjc8I3b4/edit#heading=h.haeazu2sh3sq
- ACTION ITEM: Please review this proposal. If you have
any objections to the proposal as written, please comment either on the list or at the full TC meeting tomorrow. Lack of comment is considered to be agreement with the proposal as written.
The deadline for feedback/comments is Saturday June 17th. This will allow us to open a CS ballot next week.
Thanks,
Sarah Kelley
Senior Cyber Threat Analyst
Multi-State Information Sharing and Analysis Center (MS-ISAC)
31 Tech Valley Drive
East Greenbush, NY 12061
sarah.kelley@cisecurity.org
518-266-3493
24x7 Security Operations Center
SOC@cisecurity.org - 1-866-787-4722
<image001.png>
<image002.png> <image003.png> <image004.png> <image005.png>
This message and attachments may contain confidential information. If it appears that this message was sent to you by mistake, any retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message and attachments is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender
immediately and permanently delete the message and any attachments.
. . . . .
|