Re: [cti] Minor editorial modification to STIX/TAXII 2.0 drafts

[Trey Darley <trey@newcontext.com>]

On 23.06.2017 15:39:43, Wunder, John A. wrote:
> 
> We received one more comment yesterday about the STIX/TAXII drafts
> from Greg Back (another MITRE person). Greg noticed that we didn’t
> consistently use the term “hyphen” in the drafts…in some cases we
> used hyphen-minus, in others we used hyphen, in others we used dash.
> 
> I made the following fix, please let me know if this is a problem:
> 
>   *   STIX 2.0 Parts 1-4: Used the term “hyphen”, and added a
>       sentence to the document conventions: “The term “hyphen” is
>       used throughout this document to refer to the ASCII hyphen or
>       minus character, which in Unicode is “hyphen-minus”, U+002D.”
>   *   STIX Part 5 and TAXII: had very few usages of hyphen, so just
>       used hyphen-minus (U+002D).
> 

Good catch by Greg. I'm good with this clarification, John. Clearly a
non-material clarification; it's unlikely that any implementer would
screw this up but explicit > implicit.

-- 
Cheers,
Trey
++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++
Director of Standards Development, New Context
gpg fingerprint: 3918 9D7E 50F5 088F 823F  018A 831A 270A 6C4F C338
++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++
--
"There's never enough time. Thank you for yours." --Dan Geer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature