Request for review of DNS Record object proposal for STIX 2.1

[Trey Darley <trey@newcontext.com>]

Ivan and I have been reviewing the DNS Record object (based off
RFC1035 [1]) currently defined in STIX 2.1 Cyber Observables Working
Concepts [2] with the goal of defining illustrative STIX patterns.

Please review the proposal [2] and comment if you feel there are
errors or omissions in the model.

Also, please send us your use cases for patterning against DNS data so
we can define more helpful examples.

Thanks a mil!

[1]: https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1035.txt
[2]: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PHRpmizbMGOwAu_TwRj5ofwnUEOIoM__vIDCDZGf4Sk/edit#heading=h.q9eoc8o19ynj

-- 
Cheers,
Trey
++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++
Director of Standards Development, New Context
gpg fingerprint: 3918 9D7E 50F5 088F 823F  018A 831A 270A 6C4F C338
++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++
--
"It is always possible to add another level of indirection." --RFC 1925

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature