[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: Enhancement Process
Bret, For the most part I think your proposal below is on the right track. I do however have concerns about “Redefining some semantic meaning to some properties or objects in STIX”. I don’t think this
should be something we should be advertising as an option. The only time I believe we’ve done this in the past is with the labels property, and only then after a very lengthy conversation and consideration of all the angles. I don’t want to create an easy/ready-made
process for people to start suggesting that we redefine the meanings of all of our existing work. Doing that should be hard, and for good reason. Thanks, Sarah Kelley Lead Cybersecurity Engineer, T8B2 Defensive Operations The MITRE Corporation 703-983-6242 From: cti@lists.oasis-open.org <cti@lists.oasis-open.org>
On Behalf Of Bret Jordan All, We have had several discussion about an enhancement process. In an effort to help drive this forward and help us get high-level agreement on what this would mean, here are a few points. Types of Enhancements
Requirements
Please let me know if the list of possible enhancement types is correct and if you have any additional requirements. Bret |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]