Re: Motion for Open Repository for STIX Enhancement Proposals

[Trey Darley <trey@newcontext.com>]

Hey, y'all -

Based on the consensus that emerged from subsequent discussions, I
hereby rescind this motion due to the fact that it has been made
obsolete by the new motion I just made.

Cheers,
Trey

On 24.07.2018 17:30:52, Trey Darley wrote:
> I move that the TC approve by unanimous consent requesting OASIS to
> set up an OASIS Open Repository project named
> stix-enhancement-proposals using the following pieces of information:
> 
>     * Purpose Statement: To host STIX Enhancement Proposals (SEPs) as
>       well as the central registry for both SEPs contributed to the
>       CTI TC via this repository (potentially for inclusion in the
>       standard) as well as third-party SEPs published elsewhere.
>     * Initial Maintainers: Trey Darley, Ivan Kirillov
>     * Open Source License: BSD-3-Clause License
>     * GitHub Name: stix-enhancement-proposals
>     * Short Description: OASIS Open Repository: STIX Enhancement
>       Proposals (SEPs)
> 
> If there have been no objections by Friday, 27 July at 19h UTC I will
> submit the form [1] to request OASIS staff to create the repository.
> 
> [1]: https://www.oasis-open.org/resources/tc-admin-requests/open-repository-request
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Trey
> ++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++
> Director of Standards Development, New Context
> gpg fingerprint: 3918 9D7E 50F5 088F 823F  018A 831A 270A 6C4F C338
> ++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++
> --
> "No one can terrorize a whole nation, unless we are all his
> accomplices." --Edward R. Murrow



-- 
++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++
Director of Standards Development, New Context
gpg fingerprint: 3918 9D7E 50F5 088F 823F  018A 831A 270A 6C4F C338
++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++
--
"With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not
necessarily a good idea. It is hard to be sure where they are going to
land, and it could be dangerous sitting under them as they fly
overhead." --RFC 1925

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature