Re: [cti] Invitation to comment on TAXII v2.1 - ends January 21

["Emily Ratliff" <Emily.Ratliff@ibm.com>]

Hi!

I'm a brand new member so I'm reading
the TAXII specification for the first time. I read the PDF version of the
TAXII 2.1 Committee Specification Draft 02 / Public Review Draft 01. I
found only a couple of minor issues as follows: 

clarification        Figure
1.3                
       The object being passed back is not
a response to a recent "Subscribe" message, so rather than having
"Subscribe" next to the message, the graphic would be clearer
if the receivers were labelled "Subscribers" rather than "Consumers".

format        
       1.3 Normative References    
    The label [RFC6838] is in the reference description
field rather than the reference label field.

grammar        1.6.9
               
               The
second sentence refers to Authorization and WWW-Authentication respectively,
but they are out of order so respectively doesn't apply. Recommend dropping
the word respectively.

typo        
       7        
               
       Title sentence has a typo "extent"
should read "extend"

clarification        8.1.3/8.4.3
               
       In the conformance section, the conformance
requirements for Channels are listed as RESERVED. Without actively participating
in the TC, it is difficult to understand what this means in practice for
a server that is otherwise conformant to the requirements. I would recommend
removing these sections until Channels are defined.

Thanks! Emily Emily Ratliff STSM, IBM Security Research Initiative Lead

Phone:1-512-286-9947 | Mobile:1-512-653-1052 E-mail: Emily.Ratliff@ibm.com	11501 Burnet Rd Austin, TX 78758-3400 United States